Artificial cells: prospects for biotechnology
Abstract: A variety of techniques can now be used to alter the genome of a cell. Although these techniques are very powerful, they have limitations related to cost and efficiency of scale. Artificial cells designed for specific applications combine properties of biological systems such as nanoscale efficiency, self-organization and adaptability at relatively low cost. Individual components needed for such structures have already been developed, and now the main challenge is to integrate them in functional microscopic compartments. It will then become possible to design and construct communities of artificial cells that can perform different tasks related to therapeutic and diagnostic applications.[0T,juVyE1PRecent advances in molecular biology have created opportunities to modify living cells in ways that have significant applications in biotechnology. A variety of techniques can now be used to alter the genome of a cell by well-established approaches such as recombinant DNA, gene shuffling and knockout mutations. These techniques are most advanced for single-celled microorganisms but have also been successfully applied to multicellular species. However, there are limitations associated with genetic techniques with respect to cost and efficiency of scale. Furthermore, genetically modified cells require specialized nutrient media, the desired products of genetic manipulations might be toxic to the cells and combining cellular and non-biological technologies is often difficult. Genetic engineering also poses significant safety and ethical issues.lwM#e QTHq
An alternative approach is to build simple, cell-like structures that are engineered for a specific application. A few such systems have been created, and many of the components needed to construct more complex artificial cells with biotechnological potential are already in place. We first consider a theoretical minimal cell that incorporates all properties of the living state, including growth and evolution. Such a minimal cell has never been constructed, but listing its properties illustrates how far we have to go before the claim of artificial cellular life can be made (Box 1). The most complex version of a minimal cell, verging on being truly alive, would include a translation apparatus that could use sequence information in one type of polymer to direct the synthesis of a second type of polymer. In contem
¨ Box 1. Properties of an ideal minimal cell)cL!F*{(uU K(l3z]`Z
¨ An information-carrying polymer, such as a nucleic acid, must be synthesized by a template-directed polymerization that occurs in a membrane-bound volume.
¨ The monomers of the polymer must be provided externally and transported across the membrane boundary to support the replication process. Other small molecules or ions needed for biosynthetic reactions must be delivered from the environment.]&},kGi_AO*I
¨ An external source of chemical energy must be available to drive the biosynthetic reactions."Duz ]mC`,S
¨ A catalytic activity must be present that is linked to the replication process, so that variations in replication affect the catalyzed reactions. Under such circumstances, variations will change fitness of the system and lead to evolution. Compartmentalization of the replicating catalytic system within a membrane-bound volume allows selection of variations, leading to ‘speciation’.$vUl6rM$Dp:L.bi
¨ The boundary membrane itself must be able to grow, either by accumulation of membrane-forming material from the environment or by conversion of precursor molecules into such material.
¨ There must be a mechanism that allows the assembly to separate into two or more smaller structures during the growth process, and the smaller structures should contain the capabilities of the larger system.
¨ Catalysis, replication and growth must be well regulated so that none of the processes lags behind or gets far ahead of other processes in the cell..KT B6\d,`S
If we were to attempt the construction of an idealized artificial cell with the properties listed in Box 1, what components are available to be incorporated into the molecular system? The simplest is the boundary membrane itself. Membranous vesicles composed of pure lipid bilayers have been in the laboratory repertoire for more than 30 years. The second component is a replicating molecular system. A variety of nucleic acid polymerases are commonly used to catalyze the synthesis of DNA and RNA from template molecules, using nucleotide triphosphates as substrates. The third component is a translation system, in which genetic information present in nucleic acids is used to direct the synthesis of specific proteins. Again, translation systems are readily available that use ribosomes and activated amino acids to produce peptides and larger proteins. Finally, we have at our disposal a broad range of natural and engineered proteins that have been optimized for many catalytic, binding and structural functions. These proteins can be used to construct artificial metabolisms inside vesicles.
Although the individual pieces of molecular machinery are available, the ability to combine them into an integrated system is still lacking. In this article, we describe each of the components in detail and then discuss the prospects for establishing such a system.`)B XDd p D:}
Creating membrane boundaries
Preparing lipid bilayer vesicles (liposomes) is a mature field and they are already being used by the pharmaceutical industry as drug delivery agents and in certain cosmetic preparations. Lipid vesicles were first prepared in the 1960s by Bangham and coworkers [1]. They are now referred to as multilamellar vesicles (MLVs) because most vesicles were composed of hundreds of concentric lipid bilayers. Because the multilamellar character is often a limitation, efforts immediately began to produce more homogeneous preparations, and it was found that small unilamellar vesicles (SUVs) could be prepared by sonication of MLV, having dimensions in the range of 25 nm to 100 nm. Large unilamellar vesicles (LUVs) ranging from 100 nm to 1μm diameter were first prepared in the mid-1970s [2] and are standard preparations today. The most common preparation method is extrusion through polycarbonate filters [3].uOVI2]V
Which of these preparations might be most appropriate for artificial cells? The smallest forms of cellular life are 0.2¨--0.5 μm in diameter, so, in principle LUVs could contain a sufficient number of macromolecules to form artificial cellular systems. These are convenient for several reasons, the most important being that they are readily prepared and reasonably stable.
Transport across cell walls
A vesicle is just an envelope for an artificial cellular system. To turn it into a functional unit there must be mechanisms for exchange of nutrients, waste products, regulatory molecules and ions between the vesicle and its environment. The internal volume of a typical liposome with a diameter of 0.2 μm is only 4x10-18 liters, which means that in a 1.0 mM substrate concentration only 2400 substrate molecules for a given enzymatic reaction might be captured. These would be entirely used up in less than a second at typical enzymatic reaction rates and so transmembrane transport is essential.9Lf#hD2BL,l
Although many small, neutral molecules simply diffuse through vesicle walls, lipid bilayers present substantial permeability barriers to charged, zwitterionic and macromolecular species. To some extent their permeation properties can be regulated through manipulating the width and composition of the bilayer [4]. For instance, by choosing short-chain lipids it is possible to prepare liposomes that allow smaller molecules to permeate but retain macromolecules [5]. However, to achieve efficient, controlled and selective transport an assisted mechanism is necessary. This is provided by either carrier molecules or transmembrane proteins, channels and pumps. Channels and carriers mediate passive transport (along the concentration gradient) whereas pumps use energy to transport species against the gradient.0@y0[&t(un2P
Although ion-conducting channels in a cell membrane can be complex, their transmembrane portions are often relatively simple. They consist of a. bundle of α-helices or a barrel of β-strands, but occasionally form nanotubes [6]. Moreover, many channels retain their functions even if a large fraction of the protein is removed. This relative simplicity can be exploited to design synthetic channels or re-engineer natural ones so that they have the desired transport properties. This is done through manipulations of the amino acid sequence along the pore, helix orientation and the diameter of the transmembrane cavity, thereby providing fine-tuning of electrostatic and steric interaction between the transported solute and the channel. Probably most common design is based on four to six helices arranged about a central axis. A particularly simple example is the neutral peptide, Ac-(Leu-Ser-Ser-Leu- Leu-Ser-Leu)3CONH2, which forms a voltage-gated channel. Addition of a negative or positive charge in the mouth of the channel respectively increases or eliminates selectivity towards cations [7]. By contrast, a tetrameric channel formed by 25-residue fragments of the M2 protein from the human influenza virus, shown in Fig. 1, is also folded into α-helices, but does not transport alkali ions. Instead it conducts protons at remarkably high rates [8], presumably through a chain of properly aligned water molecules filling the transmembrane cavity. Selectivity is provided by a gate made of four histidine residues, one from each of the channel-forming helices, which are sufficiently large to occlude the lumen. These histidines also actively participate in proton transport [8,9].
Another class of transmembrane channels is based on cyclic peptides, which adopt flat ring structures. They stack to form hollow cylindrical nanotubes stabilized by backbone-backbone hydrogen bonding interactions. The rings are formed either by alternating -amino acids or by homochiral α-amino acids. Because no side chains project into the lumen of the channel, their specificity is manipulated primarily by changing the diameter of the cavity rather than the identity of residues forming the ring. Tubular channels are stable, well-oriented in the bilayer and can be designed to transport solutes that markedly differ in size, ranging from protons to glucose [10].
Lipid bilayers can be made accessible to even larger solutes through incorporation of a natural channel, α-hemolysin or its genetically engineered mutants [11]. For instance, the hemolysin channel can transport not just individual solutes such as nucleotide triphosphates, but even linear polymers as large as single stranded nucleic acids [12,13]c6G"` q M'C
Despite considerable advances, designing efficient and selective membrane channels remains a challenge. First, the channels must be stable and assume correct orientation and stoichiometry. This is not simple, especially for self-assembling structures, because single units often gain stability in the transmembrane orientation only through associations. This stability can be improved by appropriate single point mutations, which were shown to change the free energy of association by 1-3 kcal mol-1 [14] Another strategy to avoid insufficient stability and improper orientation and stochiometry is to covalently attach helices at specific positions to a template [15].$d {6e] N _[a
nO}"Sjo7P%z^